From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  5 00:28:30 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168C41065677
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Aug 2011 00:28:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEC98FC12
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Aug 2011 00:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id 05FBF7300A; Fri,  5 Aug 2011 02:27:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 02:27:33 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Victor Detoni <victordetoni@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110805002732.GA5340@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <CANpwN=ticS53Z43rWVbtDU18cRtWH6sOE+fhJaS4LenTfZ=gpg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANpwN=ticS53Z43rWVbtDU18cRtWH6sOE+fhJaS4LenTfZ=gpg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: High Network Perfomance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:28:30 -0000

On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
> server configuration is:
> 
> Dell 1950
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5130  @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> 4 x CPU
> 2 NIC (<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T)
> 1 NIC (em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.1.9>)
> 
> I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as
> synproxy and we still processor to handle others packets or flows.
> 
> I know that em drivers has MULTI_QUEUE implementation that helps high
> performance for Intel drivers, but I couldn't see more information about. We
> can reached 500k pps, but no more traffic was processed by this interface.
> 
> I've already enabled net.isr.direct but with Intel Drivers does not work and
> the most processors are in System instead of Interrupts, why? When I enable
> net.isr.direct the processing is balanced for on CPU in system and another
> in interrupt and I reached 1M pps, but the total perfomance is down, the
> load grow up too fast.
> 
> I've changed some parameter in sysctl for intel drivers, but it doesn't have
> effect.
> 
> Someone know what I can do to reach more packets performance? I want to use
> this FreeBSD as a router/firewall only.

if you feel like doing a bit of coding yourself, you could try netmap

http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/

cheers
luigi

> Thanks,
> Victor
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"