Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:27:15 +0200
From:      "Raphael H. Becker" <rabe@p-i-n.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: devfs ruleset 4 (jails)
Message-ID:  <20060405162714.L60206@p-i-n.com>
In-Reply-To: <200603291154.18847.jhb@freebsd.org>; from jhb@freebsd.org on Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:54:17AM -0500
References:  <20060327093503.G60206@p-i-n.com> <20060329180704.I60206@p-i-n.com> <20060329183259.J60206@p-i-n.com> <200603291154.18847.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:54:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:32, Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:07:05PM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote:
> > > PS: the box crashed just while writing this (while using devfs
> > > <something>) so I'll need to powercycle it before leaving my office.
> > crash:
[...]
> > I don't know much about the debugger, so I just resetted the box by
> > typing "reset" at the prompt.
> > Hope that helps a little.
> Well, it means that it's broken in HEAD as well at least.

Is there a workaround to hide "critical" devices from a mounted devfs?
... any patches to test?

>From my point of view this is a critical situation for machines with
jails and "foreign" roots in them while I (host admin) cannot hide disk
devices (and other critical stuff) from the jails. 

Regrads
Raphael Becker



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060405162714.L60206>