From nobody Sat Feb 10 15:46:33 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TXFSq442Wz59tDg for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (mailserver.netfence.it [78.134.96.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TXFSp66QSz55RT; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 15:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 78.134.96.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.17.2/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 41AFkX57010371 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:46:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be [10.1.2.18] Message-ID: <554b2b5f-526a-481e-9d62-7b358988215f@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:46:33 +0100 List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: iwlwifi in 14 Content-Language: en-US From: Andrea Venturoli To: freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org Cc: bz@FreeBSD.org References: <11273c7a-7584-4b8b-8cd3-5e11920ffa67@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <11273c7a-7584-4b8b-8cd3-5e11920ffa67@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.28 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.49)[-0.487]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.134.96.152:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:35612, ipnet:78.134.0.0/17, country:IT]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TXFSp66QSz55RT On 2/10/24 16:44, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Sorry to bug. > I've got a laptop with an Intel Wi-Fi 5 9461 card running 13.2. > It works, albeit slowly, but it often loses connection and "netif > restart" sometimes reboots the machine badly. > > Would 14 work better? Worse? > AFAICT speed wouldn't improve, but I'm chasing stability more than that. > > Sorry again to ask, but I read the (outdated?) wiki, the bugs, all the > recent reports, and failed to come up with a conclusive answer (my > ignorance, of course) :( > > TIA. > >  bye >     av. P.S. What about 13.3, also?