From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 05:30:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3212116A41F for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james.lists@igallagher.com) Received: from stjamesgate.citog.com (stjamesgate.citog.com [210.193.32.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCCF43D46 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james.lists@igallagher.com) Received: (qmail 12826 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2006 05:31:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 05:31:06 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:31:05 +0800 From: James Gallagher To: (Mark Linimon) Organization: iGallagher.com In-Reply-To: <20060324043956.GA10216@soaustin.net> References: <20060324043956.GA10216@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <5bfe78081556e90f4e639f3af3c435fe@localhost> X-Sender: james.lists@igallagher.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Surer Dink , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel panic in 6.1 - does no one care? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:30:14 -0000 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:39:56 -0600, linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:22:37PM -0500, Surer Dink wrote: >> Two days ago I reported a panic here >> > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023748.html) >> on a freshly cvsuped releng_6 "generic" kernel. I have heard no >> responses at all - does this mean I am posting in the wrong place, or >> does no one care about 6.1? > > Neither. It means that the volunteers are incredibly busy testing as > many things as they can for the simultaneous 5.5/6.1 release, and not > everything can be gotten to. > > mcl I also wonder if this would be better reported on -current rather than -stable as the concerned version, 6.1, is pre-release/Beta? James