Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:21:38 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Roman Bogorodskiy" <novel@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again Message-ID: <cb5206420608180321i5515c815m2192ec7a46ddc92a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060818093758.GA92685@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060816172835.GA29719@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817053955.GD62148@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817124739.GA3643@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060818064537.GA78016@underworld.novel.ru> <20060818093758.GA92685@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers. Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We often work on some things together and/or from multiple locations. It feels so awkward to send patches in email attachments or uploading them somewhere. Moreover, with a new VCS, I expect a possibility for maintainers to gain commit rights to some separate branches. Committers may then easily review and merge changes to the trunk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420608180321i5515c815m2192ec7a46ddc92a>