From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 16 07:00:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ED516A4CE for ; Sun, 16 May 2004 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out011.verizon.net (out011pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DED43D39 for ; Sun, 16 May 2004 07:00:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([68.161.84.3]) by out011.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040516140012.TDLY18566.out011.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Sun, 16 May 2004 09:00:12 -0500 Message-ID: <40A77452.6050105@mac.com> Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 10:01:54 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20040515005503.GA9224@tao.thought.org> <40A579DA.7070404@mac.com> <20040516022518.GB70076@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040516022518.GB70076@tao.thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from [68.161.84.3] at Sun, 16 May 2004 09:00:12 -0500 Subject: Re: blacklist(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 14:00:13 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 10:00:58PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: >>According to the RFCs, one MUST NOT bounce mail sent to postmaster. >>One ought to read the rfc-ignorant.org site I mentioned. [ ... ] > Well, bit again. The line in my access file was > > 206.46 550 Verizon email not wanted here > > that I've commented out. This isn't the first time I've had > to fine tune; it probably won't be the last. Apologies! Consider using FEATURE(`delay_checks', `friend') and add the following to the access map: Spam:abuse@ FRIEND Spam:postmaster@ FRIEND [ Pre 8.12 versions of sendmail use To: instead ] ...which will allow you to block mail as you please using IP or other reject rules, yet not prevent delivery of mail to postmaster and abuse... -- -Chuck