From owner-freebsd-net Thu Nov 5 10:18:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA09552 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA09547 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:18:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA26558; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdm26541; Thu Nov 5 18:16:43 1998 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:16:11 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Craig Metz cc: enkhyl@hayseed.net, "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipsec (VPN) for -current ? (Re: VPN through encrypted IP tunnel for FreeBSD? ) In-Reply-To: <199811051312.NAA21643@inner.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maybe the first step is to ask ALL the groups to present us with a set of include files that they can ALL live with. it should be possible for someone to generate include files that specify all the RFC specified values and constants, that ALL the groups can use. julian On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Craig Metz wrote: > In message , you wr > ite: > >IPsec is still an evolving standard, so I don't think there is a single > >implementation that's "finished", per se. > > The next release of NRL's IPv6+IPsec (due in order days) also supports > FreeBSD 3.0. > > All the implementations I know of have their strengths and their weaknesses. > > -Craig > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message