From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Dec 23 10:43:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2970EEA249E for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 803FC7F081 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([92.227.100.135]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LjvV7-1f07CQ2OPh-00buJl; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 11:42:15 +0100 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F2D23CEED; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 11:42:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Procmail got updated! To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , Eugene Grosbein References: <5A39F7C9.1030800@grosbein.net> <05504d3c-3225-e83f-8f10-225319421a35@gmx.de> <5A3B7BFF.2020202@grosbein.net> <845b162a-918d-4a5f-c3c2-4f58b60bff73@gmx.de> <5A3CA1B5.2090907@grosbein.net> From: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <1f5623f9-0ed1-3fb7-d81a-efd2f08ae3c8@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 11:42:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cpjhknmACuxO1IISTD8j9L3batLdemqNUKrt0PJdL7Em2+xEoUG Ip+MMm2zBGNCQQGbKdkctIj++406c6BXRP3EhAldAYnpex8EejUJn8uyeLvGBBoOXTXFYmm h1qdGaZYvY1hMdlMc9+ldFFynMm92N5rT+KpMaAyDGv7SHAp4RvW5zNdWgTJSBRhQWfSXp4 hrjvSdlQhYzofDhpa6DLw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:1Pu6Q51QCCA=:tdXZz0ZosvTvQsVHXD/83w S4dgtrSy6Pf3LiiehxX1Xhsv1Vw/bGOLIgLSUjSUv4TzZNGGQvCLZSDalVso+hCOqlrcGJyuo q/kjLjq00aap3V9UAF7LhnSQczKa5uHcgE+i6QAzbG4bJiMCnWNWz4Mw77wRj4vj7zkyALeFZ 7jTwYy4YIvrozEX6kkgYoKnyYaaoxCTg4PeyMlMU+9x/hcNPXj6ExxSZbqXeNHwPRhOAQ1sKa 0zUztbO9HUbP33XrJd8spfvS7Cs9Bf4FlRj5KrXO9G/7X0yWCY9qc1eeOrmfDo1B7aPgPWOfu gRrwt+nCSUsFeqwzPvwHEWtv4rHyf+NSK2Q6VExLzEBq8bQXJjm8Bq6egp2WIf1HLzk4D4CQn CJGOe9aZXiN0d2Cwb/6Kx9+0wXw/36XuIW1eJvTwSdXTnGl6/RF9kYJfb0dVxuRvNXAPUqK7k cuM97jq/1MZUo00Hlto+/2rIgy4hF1eS1gs1ArZLp6nHB3+XfM33aKMB5S78CaNQkgD7AQcLG lucUmebCxI/4i3Dba7wu+rxmRBhJTa/19eRah7E5g9zHoakMkgn/Ve5SmZDZ6itXhvWJRtmav FD+PVWrapuNlK/erkCp0gOh+ADuPw6fCqdHTyyKg32a/0NAz53jV6h0XoT7SdxUKMitbx6JBA bSZMMJID7/GFbbLQyz1doapViMj4yNwLWBUOTtQJsVaavjJ4ezKYRcL9ZkAp6MOM3jqS29EzC HzbBfizv2GVevSd+1uII3VoD5EWeMv4kmtwOo3vEV2qBPaKyEKNmrXPt+ZLFYQ6Us4mc4DxDw Po+F9YL1YvBI6jTwpsF9L+wEYkkk/YK2CADO6Tdq0WGvecl6W4= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:43:02 -0000 Am 23.12.2017 um 08:12 schrieb Kevin Oberman: > > So, why does Eugene's question have no relevance to the procmail > case?=C2=A0 Could you please explain? Because I am not willing to discuss generics when we have a specific case of port at hand. The attempted generalization distracts from that, and I insinuate that distraction is the purpose. Everyone is free to start a new thread about general port maintenance and removal principles.