From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 13 16:52:59 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA17126
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:52:59 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA17121
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:52:56 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA18590; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:47:01 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199510132347.QAA18590@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: DOS Emulation under FreeBSD
To: gurney_j@efn.org
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 16:47:00 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com, root@synthcom.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.91.951013164938.26443C-100000@nike.efn.org> from "John-Mark Gurney" at Oct 13, 95 04:50:21 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 465       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > This is probably nothing compared to support of DOS binaries on non-Intel
> > hardware, something that would be unutterbly cool.
> 
> that is what pcemu does...  supposedly it runs on Suns...  of course I 
> think it only does 8088 code though... TTYL..

8086, I think.

In general, an 80386 soloution is really required.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.