From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 21:18:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344BA37B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2C443F3F; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:18:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6U4IpFL013887; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:18:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:18:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030729.221805.113566203.imp@bsdimp.com> To: mb@imp.ch From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030730013027.D25188@cvs.imp.ch> References: <20030730013027.D25188@cvs.imp.ch> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: dhcp-client@isc.org cc: rwatson@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 04:18:59 -0000 In message: <20030730013027.D25188@cvs.imp.ch> Martin Blapp writes: : : Hi Folks, : : I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient. : : Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are: : "control" and "interface". The later is not inplemented at all. : It pretends to work, but if you look at the source there are : stubs only :P. : : "control" does only release leases and exit (state 2), I never managed to make : dhclient sleep (state 3) and wake up (state 2). : : It seems that the whole implementation is only a proof of concept : and not very functional at all, at least for the client side, dhcpd : may be different. : : I'll think about how we can solve this differently. This : really sucks ! That's why I start/kill dhclient from pccard_ether. Warner