From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 23 19:11:38 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA05949
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 19:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA05936
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 19:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from michaelh@cet.co.jp)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.8/CET-v2.2) with SMTP id CAA25489; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 02:10:24 GMT
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:10:24 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
cc: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c
In-Reply-To: <199804231600.MAA05522@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980424110909.25399B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> <<On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 01:50:05 +1000 (EST), darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au said:
> 
> > There are numerous programs like this already - ps, netstat, top, etc.
> 
> > I'd say "deal with it".
> 
> When I'm done with netstat, I hope to have its interface completely
> separated from the actual kernel internals.  It's not there yet, but I
> think I have the right ideas on how to proceed.  There's no reason why
> the same strategy can't be taken with the process table.

I haven't looked at this but wasn't this a eproc-only vs. 
eproc-with-entire-proc issue? 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message