From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 04:51:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F6C16A580; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4276043D49; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8T4pQod028266; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:51:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <451CA64D.3050703@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:51:25 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:51:34 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John Baldwin (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 > -0400): > >> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. >> Only >> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs >> and ufs >> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the >> extra isofs >> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. > > > I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are > cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed. > > Bye, > Alexander. > Moves in CVS are relatively easy too, it's just that they can only be performed by a special group of people, and that special group rarely responds to requests. So, it's a policy problem, not a technology problem. I would imagine than any new VCS that the project adopts would have similar policies in place, and moves will still be impossible. Scott