From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Jul 25 20:32:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cagsawa.cats.edu.ph (cagsawa.cats.edu.ph [203.172.25.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEDB14FF8; Sun, 25 Jul 1999 20:31:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dune@cats.edu.ph) Received: from mayon.cats.edu.ph (mayon.cats.edu.ph [203.172.25.131]) by cagsawa.cats.edu.ph (Postfix) with SMTP id 96F9DB8A1; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 11:31:48 +0800 (PHT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 11:46:23 +0800 (PHT) From: "Francis Percival C. Favoreal" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: divert Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Forgive me if this sound like a stupid question. I have been using DIVERT for some time now but never been concerned if DIVERT can work if there is only 1 NIC. I would just like to be enlightened if this is possible or if this is ridiculous. What I had in mind is two networks coexisting in one physical network. One network has registered IPs and the other one is a private network with unregistered IPS. The former has no problem communicating with the outside world. For the latter network, I have to use natd. Having just 1 physical network, I thought of having the latter network route their packets to a host running natd but with just one network interface. The host have this divert rule, divert 8668 ip from any to any I hope I provided sufficient details. Thank you in advance. -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message