Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:59:13 -0500 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: Agus <agus.262@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Which versioning system is the simplest to use?? Message-ID: <20070911195913.GA80622@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> In-Reply-To: <fda61bb50709111141h3dc9ae6dxc011c485eea83784@mail.gmail.com> References: <fda61bb50709111141h3dc9ae6dxc011c485eea83784@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:41:14PM -0300, Agus wrote: > Hi List, > > I am doing a little bit of security and log watching with sec.pl and > was trying to mantain de secconf files organized... So whenever one > is changed it keeps track of the change and can rollback.... > > O that is what i am going to use de versioning sytem for... > > I will appreciate your tips very much.... CVS is already in FreeBSD. It works very well but is widely accepted that a redesign could do better. Subversion's stated goal is to be a better CVS than CVS. The commands are very much the same but most else is different underneath. A negative to Subversion is that it tries to be everything for everyone. Doesn't appear to be a subversion-lite version available. At the moment I continue to use CVS for older stuff that was started under CVS, and SVN for new stuff. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070911195913.GA80622>