From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 19 11:43:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A959A16A4CF
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:43:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146FE43D62
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:43:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kometen@gmail.com)
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1252995rng
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=pcykgU3mpXLy/3h8wnsH4YrFuH8Ms7Y2dhpI5G7XcHqt5ir4CHbvtgOjXEGRsE6w++xcKqnckaO1OeSUG8bsOQxgVRxkyYAI6661rFf1HkUeUD6PtW55YSOoWMJ02S/jER8qtFniNtpuhVYAl8M4dpQohhZTGOf36w0kRFC9xOo=
Received: by 10.38.86.53 with SMTP id j53mr7024978rnb;
        Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.149.53 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 04:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b41c75520504190443187617de@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:43:57 +0200
From: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <4264EC60.3020600@centtech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b41c75520504190418308f94cc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4264EC60.3020600@centtech.com>
cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:43:58 -0000

> > Q:
> > Will I get better performance upgrading the server from dual PIII to du=
al Xeon?
> > A:
>=20
> rsync is CPU intensive, so depending on how much cpu you were using for t=
his,
> you may or may not gain.  How busy was the server during that time?  Is t=
his to
> a single IDE disk?  If so, you are probably bottlenecked by that IDE driv=
e.

The storage is ide->fiber. Using tcp-mounts and peaking 100 MB/s it
used just about 100 % cpu.

Rsync was only used to copy the folder recursively (-a),  it used nfs
to trasnfer the files to the nfs-server.

regards
Claus