From owner-freebsd-hardware Fri Feb 21 10:42:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA12040 for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 10:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from robkaos.ruhr.de (robkaos.ruhr.de [141.39.227.87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA12021 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 1997 10:42:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by robkaos.ruhr.de (/\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.1) id ; Fri, 21 Feb 97 19:41 MET Message-Id: From: robsch@robkaos.ruhr.de (Robert Schien) Subject: Performance problem with P6-200 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 19:41:31 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following may be somewhat off topic, but I have some problems with my new P6NP5 motherboard from ASUS and a PPro-200 (256k). When I run the C-linpack or other floating point stuff I can't get more than 14 MFLOPS (with double precision). With single precision I get 69 MFLOPS which is fine. Is it notmal that the P6 has such a lousy double precision performance? What can the reason be? The system has 64 MB EDO-RAM. And yes, all caches are enabled. The C-linpack is compiled with cc from -current (version 2.7.2.1). pgcc doesn't help. The C-linpack doesn't use any special library routine except the floor function. It would be nice if someone with a P6-200 could send me some results of FP benchmarks. BTW, Dhrystone 2.1 delivers 432000 dhrystones/second. Is this ok? TIA for your help. Robert