From owner-cvs-all  Tue Oct 30  7:18: 6 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (sentinel.office1.bg [217.75.129.210])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3A8F37B403
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 94603 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Oct 2001 14:11:05 -0000
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:11:05 +0200
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include malloc.h
Message-ID: <20011030161105.A93996@straylight.oblivion.bg>
Mail-Followup-To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
References: <200110250235.f9P2ZTU86318@freefall.freebsd.org> <200110250239.f9P2dfn50520@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200110250239.f9P2dfn50520@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:39:41PM -0400
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:39:41PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:35:29 -0700 (PDT), Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.org> said:
> 
> >   Resume deorbit burn sequence for <malloc.h>.  Inspection of my make logs
> >   reveals no programs in the standard build which hit the previous warning
> >   message.  This change will NOT be merged to 4-stable.
> 
> This was discussed in one of the mailing-lists a few months ago.  The
> postponement of 5.0 means that port maintainers have almost a year to
> fix programs which still use this 10-years-obsolete header.
> <malloc.h> was never part of Standard C and is was included in SUSv2.
> 
> As the error message suggests, the correct fix for any program which
> unconditionally includes <malloc.h> is to include <stdlib.h> instead.

Just BTW, what is the correct test to use for malloc.h vs stdlib.h?
Will __STDC__ be enough?

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message