Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:18:07 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() Message-ID: <m3acr31yhc.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20050120224017.GA71573@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey Chernov's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:40:18 %2B0300") References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120224017.GA71573@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > This is just their intehtions explanation, not excuse. If several > standards are in contradiction, POSIX vote is final. It may surprise you, > but it covers and changes lots of cases comparing to minimalistic C > standard. Such additions/changes are specially marked with different color > (gray). I do not have a place of discovery handy, but wasn't POSIX explicitly deferring in to the C standard and giving it precedence for any conflicts between the C standard library and POSIX? -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3acr31yhc.fsf>