From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 17 21:58:25 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6771065670;
	Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610038FC08;
	Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8HLwMnY026390;
	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 04:58:22 +0700 (NOVST)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Message-ID: <4E7517F9.4070908@rdtc.ru>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 04:58:17 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110112 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201109172033.p8HKXqm8056115@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<4E7512C1.2040400@FreeBSD.org> <4E751534.8070307@grosbein.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4E751534.8070307@grosbein.pp.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/160273 and ports/160272
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:58:25 -0000

18.09.2011 04:46, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
> 18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет:
>> Hi,
>>
>> now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper?
>>
>> I'm currently usure what  to do with these PRs.
> 
> I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 in spite of PR fixing it:

I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed.

> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/160273
> 
> That was mistake and it should be revived and fixed with the patch from the PR.
> 
> Eugene Grosbein