From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 21 15:34:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f67.hotmail.com [216.32.181.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF8F37B410 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:34:46 -0700 Received: from 24.196.232.182 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:34:46 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.196.232.182] From: "Kenneth Mays" To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on a MaxAttach? Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:34:46 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jun 2002 22:34:46.0796 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8BC7CC0:01C21973] Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I noticed that the SNAP Servers are far better in performance than the MaxAttach. WinNT/2000 embedded was a nice idea, but its so bloated I think they screwed it up a bit in its efficiency. BSDI v4.3 and FreeBSD kernels are more up to the task (I have BSDI whick rocks in its own right). The mini iso does wonders for me for custom solutions. I wonder if Solaris 9 can hold a few candles to BSDI v4.3 or FreeBSD v4.6. We need a few articles to compare these notes!!! ;o> Ken _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message