From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Dec  2 14:52:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA19385
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 14:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA19380
          for <freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 14:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA16548 for freebsd-ports@freefall.cdrom.com; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 15:52:16 -0700 (MST)
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199612022252.PAA16548@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: jove subshells
To: freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD ports)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 15:52:15 -0700 (MST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings!
    I'm seeing some bogus behaviour of jove subshells.  Could someone
verify similar lossage?  (just open a subshell window -- ESC X shell --
and do something simple like 'ls'...)
    Thx!
--don