From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 21 16:36:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A841065673; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk@ncf.ca) Received: from mail.ncf.ca (mail.ncf.ca [134.117.136.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1418FC15; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chiron.lan (69-196-181-103.dsl.ncf.ca [69.196.181.103]) (Authenticated sender: du880@ncf.ca) by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1658D93DF2; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:35:49 -0500 (EST) From: Dwayne MacKinnon To: Andriy Gapon Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:35:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.7.3; i386; ; ) References: <201201191706.46553.dmk@ncf.ca> <201201201656.05155.dmk@ncf.ca> <4F1AB9E5.5050302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F1AB9E5.5050302@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201211135.35559.dmk@ncf.ca> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Odd reboot problems with 9.0-RELEASE i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:36:01 -0000 That's the thing... neither do I. I never did. But it happened nonetheless. I'm hoping that somebody with some time to kill might try out the config and see if it can be duplicated. Cheers, DMK On January 21, 2012 08:13:09 AM Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/01/2012 23:56 Dwayne MacKinnon said the following: > > As there is interest, I've redone my kernel config in the style espoused > > by Andriy & Mark. > > This looks much more manageable. Unfortunately, I do not see anything that > could have cause the problem that you've reported. > > > On January 20, 2012 02:24:46 PM Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> I think that it probably could be easier for you and for those > >>> reviewing your kernel config if you 'include'-d GENERIC into your > >>> kernel config and then used device/nodevice, options/nooptions, etc to > >>> make your customizations. > >> > >> I strongly recommend this path. > >> > >> It took a long period of time to factor out the crazy kernel configs > >> that were used all over the package building nodes. The "stuff that > >> changed" wound up only being ~15 lines, 10 of which were common to all > >> nodes and archs. The rest were minor tweaks. > >> > >> But there was no way to tell that without a lot of detective work. > >> > >> mcl