Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:35:35 -0500 From: Dwayne MacKinnon <dmk@ncf.ca> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Odd reboot problems with 9.0-RELEASE i386 Message-ID: <201201211135.35559.dmk@ncf.ca> In-Reply-To: <4F1AB9E5.5050302@FreeBSD.org> References: <201201191706.46553.dmk@ncf.ca> <201201201656.05155.dmk@ncf.ca> <4F1AB9E5.5050302@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That's the thing... neither do I. I never did. But it happened nonetheless. I'm hoping that somebody with some time to kill might try out the config and see if it can be duplicated. Cheers, DMK On January 21, 2012 08:13:09 AM Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 20/01/2012 23:56 Dwayne MacKinnon said the following: > > As there is interest, I've redone my kernel config in the style espoused > > by Andriy & Mark. > > This looks much more manageable. Unfortunately, I do not see anything that > could have cause the problem that you've reported. > > > On January 20, 2012 02:24:46 PM Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> I think that it probably could be easier for you and for those > >>> reviewing your kernel config if you 'include'-d GENERIC into your > >>> kernel config and then used device/nodevice, options/nooptions, etc to > >>> make your customizations. > >> > >> I strongly recommend this path. > >> > >> It took a long period of time to factor out the crazy kernel configs > >> that were used all over the package building nodes. The "stuff that > >> changed" wound up only being ~15 lines, 10 of which were common to all > >> nodes and archs. The rest were minor tweaks. > >> > >> But there was no way to tell that without a lot of detective work. > >> > >> mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201211135.35559.dmk>