From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 29 07:10:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA97516A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from santiago.pacific.net.sg (santiago.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BADC143D5A for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:09:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 21441 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 14:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by santiago with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 14:09:53 -0000 Received: from pacific.net.sg ([210.24.202.28]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20040429140952.BWON1277.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@pacific.net.sg>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:09:52 +0800 Message-ID: <40910B82.4070907@pacific.net.sg> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:04:50 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20040429105811.I60328@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20040429105811.I60328@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI drive recommendation in 1U box ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:10:00 -0000 Hi, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I'm looking to put together a series of 1U boxes that will act as web/mail > servers ... its been mentioned to me that the Cheetahs run a wee bit hot > for 1U boxes ... can anyone recommend experiences with either those > drives, or others, in a 1U environment that they'd recommend? > we have both Seagates and Fujitsus running. We did not have any failures with both types within the last two years. We have had some failures with IBM SCSI drives. Just make sure that the drives are within the airflow. I personally prefere the Fujitsu SCSI drives since the Eighties. Erich