From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 31 11:57: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D155714C01 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:56:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA27412732; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:56:38 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:58:19 +0100 To: Tom , "Rodney W. Grimes" From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple IP addresses Cc: Mike Bristow , "N.B. DelMore" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 9:45 AM -0800 2000/1/27, Tom wrote: > On a side note, I'd actually like to see a mechanism to attach owners to > IPs, and allows owners to bind to ports < 1024. Perhaps some sort of > role-based control system needs to be looked at. You can't do this via the virtual machine "jail" that Poul-Henning Kamp is going to be talking about at SANE 2000? ;-) -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message