From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 16 01:17:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F94106566B for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jyavenard@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AB28FC0A for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so3647245iwn.13 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:17:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=l6+UoQM7DUWM7/mBRP5giwAaXqVYmCfJ8Gt7tXnAUfo=; b=NRYi+B+j3Ecatw5F4SvfRhcGlm4CDjv25MwFGYOheDeVTmFJIMUQmFzFJa8FLtx1SN nv3ulm5SX3kDFZUmbLBaY/qoFWon77SUDcOC8V34zOq/HIQd/HE3zXmmlG0GdeCda14a BlWn29FQmpYg2sTCyDq4y/nGxqQHOfKFLzLRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KDLZ+sPIr8dNgwFf/tnZkytn2mBqHGm0mIpeMOcC8gGMIwl4MmRl2PExGF3Kw8ecHh 7o8CpU6aYnk6Ym9qdEc6gidAK/Jx7KwroJKATJTqPPmVVH6JvECqB8cNYPYD/19E+mVT yrpxS+7ZETYS9tAL2OkSjF3n2NfWlRkpcKwTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.173.202 with SMTP id s10mr2609046icz.397.1295140648848; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.172.69 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:17:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110115224857.GA42408@stack.nl> References: <20110115224857.GA42408@stack.nl> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: Jean-Yves Avenard To: Jilles Tjoelker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" , Pete French Subject: Re: Policy on static linking ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:17:29 -0000 Hi On 15 January 2011 23:48, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > The approach has been used by Debian for some time. > > Links: > http://chris.dzombak.name/blog/2010/03/building-openssl-with-symbol-versioning/ > http://chris.dzombak.name/files/openssl/openssl-0.9.8l-symbolVersioning.diff > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1222&user=guest&pass=guest This sounds very interesting. I do have trouble understanding on how this would make a difference with how it's currently working. base openssl uses libssl.so.6 and libcrypto.so.6 current port openssl is using .so.7 So they too have different sonames; How could changing this to .so.0.9.8 for base and so.1.0.2 for port make things behave differently? JY