Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 00:56:55 +1100 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category qt? Message-ID: <20181224135655.ngjq55bpnhjtecwc@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at> References: <eb51f987-0cad-a9d8-3536-131019fbaf31@utanet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 2018-12-24 11:06:56 UTC+0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld (w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) wrote: > The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree. > > It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I think it > is easier to find (and also easier to maintain). Why? You'd end up with, for eg. VirtualBox at emulators/virtualbox-ose being moved to qt/virtualbox-ose, and QEMU remain as emulators/qemu, which is a system that makes no sense to me. I suspect many other people would object to something like that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181224135655.ngjq55bpnhjtecwc>