From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 05:33:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7A637B401 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5011443FAF for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:33:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leimy2k@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([68.19.154.48]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030813123350.GCHY27767.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mac.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:33:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030813112706.U42447-100000@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <200308131008.h7DA88xX086193@spider.deepcore.dk> <20030813112706.U42447-100000@ury.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v582) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63485FE8-CD8A-11D7-9AB2-0003937E39E0@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Leimbach Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 07:33:48 -0500 To: Gavin Atkinson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.582) cc: Soeren Schmidt cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TESTERS WANTED for ATAng preview 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:33:52 -0000 I am rather naive on the topic but don't many drives have a "single drive" jumper which works better than a master with no slave at times? On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 5:43 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Soeren Schmidt wrote: >> It seems Gavin Atkinson wrote: >>> ata1: spurious interrupt - status=0x7f error=0x7f reason=0x7f >>> ad0: 19881MB [40395/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 >>> acd0: CDROM at ata1-slave PIO4 >> >> OK, your CDROM doesn't like to be a sole master it appears... > > I hate it when people respond with this, but I'm going to join them and > say "It works under Windows"... Also, under the new code, this problem > prevents the booting of the machine, but under the old code the machine > carries on booting after giving up on the drive. > > Is it possible for this failure mode to not prevent the booting of the > machine at least? > > Gavin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"