Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:15:26 -0500 From: Charles Howse <chowse@charter.net> To: Tom Worster <fsb@thefsb.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Running Apache with as few modules as possible Message-ID: <CCC70317-5DA9-46EE-9DDC-08384F106669@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <C61CD163.A1CC%fsb@thefsb.org> References: <C61CD163.A1CC%fsb@thefsb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 28, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Tom Worster wrote: > On 4/28/09 3:14 PM, "Charles Howse" <chowse@charter.net> wrote: > >> Can anyone see anything that I've commented that I'll be sorry for? >> Can anyone suggest any more testing I should do? > > unfortunately i can't but i'd like to ask you to tell us, once > you're done > with removing modules, how much memory you saved relative to where you > started. > > i'm curious because i went through a similar exercise not long ago > and would > be interested to compare notes. OK, here we go: With Apache running on the development machine, modules commented as in my first post -- CPU: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8% interrupt, 98.1% idle Mem: 27M Active, 139M Inact, 64M Wired, 11M Cache, 34M Buf, 648K Free Swap: 512M Total, 60K Used, 512M Free Apache running on the same machine without any modules commented except mod_ssl -- CPU: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.4% interrupt, 98.1% idle Mem: 27M Active, 134M Inact, 64M Wired, 13M Cache, 34M Buf, 3584K Free Swap: 512M Total, 60K Used, 512M Free I just ran 'top' after starting httpd to get these figures, maybe I should have done something different? 'bout the only thing that makes sense to me is I have more Free Memory when commenting all those modules. What is the list's opinion on this?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CCC70317-5DA9-46EE-9DDC-08384F106669>