From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 18 03:30:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1743216A41C
	for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:30:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from john@goodleaf.net)
Received: from goodleaf.net (clyde.goodleaf.net [64.95.191.178])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC50743D1F
	for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:30:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from john@goodleaf.net)
Received: by goodleaf.net (Postfix, from userid 1701)
	id 1B5315A2A; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clyde (localhost.goodleaf.net [127.0.0.1])
	by goodleaf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F85E57EA
	for <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 192.168.1.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user goodleaf);
	by www.goodleaf.net with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50685.192.168.1.6.1119065443.squirrel@192.168.1.6>
In-Reply-To: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org>
References: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: "John Goodleaf" <john@goodleaf.net>
To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 
	autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on clyde.goodleaf.net
Subject: Re: postfix or qmail?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware <freebsd-hardware.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hardware>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hardware-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:30:40 -0000

You may have better luck with this question on a different list, but
I'll throw one out there. I prefer postfix. I'm not knocking qmail,
which is a fine piece of software. I just think postfix is a bit
cleaner and easier to configure and maintain. For my purposes it has
been adequately powerful, though I believe qmail has a broader range
of add-on products sitting around.
J

Luciano Musacchio said:
> hi,
> I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :), I've a fair review for
> both from
> some linux admins, now, I want to know fbsd's community opinion :).
> The mail
> server (now running sendmail) serves ~300 accounts.
>
> Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do
> anyone
> know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? (i mean,
> the
> latter is far more popular, right?),
>
> thanks ppl
>
> --
> "Los buenos artistas copian, los grandes roban" -- Steve Jobs
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-hardware-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>