From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 20 22:15:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (pm3-4.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.85.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99614BE4 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:15:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA99984; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:15:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:15:16 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Zepeda To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: Dan Moschuk , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNOME In-Reply-To: <199903210608.AAA59605@spawn.nectar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > All of the current GNOME ports depend upon the gtk12 and glib12 > ports, AFAIK. There are, I think, some GTK ports that are left > depending upon 1.1.16 (gtk11-devel port) right now. They should > still build, and their respective maintainers will probably update > them sooner or later (if they need no major modifications to work > with GTK 1.2). Perhaps I picked some bad ports, gmc and balsa. gmc needed a little tweaking (of the patches?!) to get itself built, and works as well as expcted (it doesn't). Balsa OTOH wouldn't even compile. It seems to be wanting version 0.4.9?!? the latest version available from www.balsa.net was 0.4.6.2... even after telling it to depend on Gtk+ 1.2 it wouldn't build. I'm not quite sure what the maintainer was thinking here. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message