From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 17 11:46:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA29492
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.5.84])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA29480
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from tlambert@usr06.primenet.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA15041;
	Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:45:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from usr06.primenet.com(206.165.6.206)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd015021; Fri Oct 17 11:45:39 1997
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA17849;
	Fri, 17 Oct 1997 11:44:23 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199710171844.LAA17849@usr06.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] Is recvmsg for ancillary (control) data part of protocol or generic sockets?
To: moncrg@ma.ultranet.com (Gregory D Moncreaff)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 18:44:23 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <01bcd8f1$a05d0560$01657392@moncrg> from "Gregory D Moncreaff" at Oct 14, 97 06:36:34 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> was looking at design and implementation 4.4 and
> there was a PRU_RECV, PRU_RECVOOB but no
> PRU_RECVCTL.
> 
> just wondering how the control data gets from the
> protocol to the user....

man recvmsg.

The control and data parts are retrieved simultaneously.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.