From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 15 04:23:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF3016A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:23:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.ddcom.co.jp (proxy.ddcom.co.jp [211.121.191.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 375A643D1F for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:23:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rees@ddcom.co.jp) Received: (qmail 26111 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2005 04:36:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO matthew) (10.10.10.11) by mail.ddcom.local with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 04:36:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:23:51 +0900 From: Joel To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <425EB486.5090001@root.org> References: <425E7DBD.8060107@alumni.rice.edu> <425EB486.5090001@root.org> Message-Id: <20050415131817.E89F.REES@ddcom.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.06 Subject: Re: RELENG_5 broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 04:23:53 -0000 On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:20:54 -0700 Nate Lawson wrote > Jon Noack wrote: > > On 4/14/2005 8:28 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:26:17PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >>> Anyone seen this? > >> > >> > >> [... > >> /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_bus.c:1082: warning: no previous prototype for > >> 'devclass_get_drivers' > >> *** Error code 1 > >> ... > >> ] > >> > >> Yup; just a few minutes ago, with sys/kern/subr_bus.c rev. 1.156.2.6. > >> > >> Perhaps something was overlooked in the MFC from 2005-04-14 04:54:15 UTC? > > > > Yeah, we also need to MFC rev. 1.68 of src/sys/sys/bus.h. > > I've committed the prototype, much apologies for the breakage. I > compiled the patch in my RELENG_5 tree just fine, but it appears the > kernel build may be referencing /sys for includes instead of > ../../../sys or whatever. Thus build-testing MFC patches on a -current > box is not a good test. Okay, I started a build makeworld in /usr/src last night, and then build make kernel hits this. What do we do next? Is it okay to go back to cvsup, and will that pick up the changes? -- Joel Rees digitcom, inc. 株式会社デジコム Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 ** **