From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 24 18:05:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A40C16A4CE
	for <mobile@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:05:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [12.15.124.245])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E2443FF5
	for <mobile@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:05:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com)
Received: from evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
	(evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net [4.46.162.188])
	by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 60DA6191; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:06:07 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, mobile@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:05:14 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200311240338.hAO3cdE9002231@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <200311240338.hAO3cdE9002231@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200311242005.14198.racerx@makeworld.com>
Subject: Re: -CURRENT, D-Link DFE-670TXD gets "device_probe_and_attach: ed1
	attach returned 6"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 02:05:30 -0000

On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:38 pm, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This has actually been a fairly long-standing issue on my laptop, but my
> laptop was having problems, then I had problems with -CURRENT ....
> anyway, I'm back to tracking -STABLE and -CURRENT daily, and this
> appears to be quite reproduceable.
>

Well now, can someone confirm if this same card works under 4.9?