From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 19 03:30:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EC2106564A; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8418FC08; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:30:23 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBALNoQE/LevdH/2dsb2JhbAAMN7UkAQEBBCcRQRALGAkWDwkDAgECAUUTAQUCAQEFiAC5FowoBg4CAgUDAgMHBAQCAgMaA4NAEAgDCgoBDQgOgx4EqDc Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.8.155]) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2012 13:45:06 +1030 Message-ID: <4F4068F4.5060109@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:43:56 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org References: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/163933: Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:30:24 -0000 On 09/01/2012 10:13, scheidell@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: scheidell > State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 8 23:42:16 UTC 2012 > State-Changed-Why: > This port has no official maintainer. > If you would take over maintance of this port, someone will commit your patches. > (ports without official maintainers tend to be ignored, and eventually dropped) > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163933 > My first opinion is that security/zenmap uses the same tarball as security/nmap to install python files for a gui that nmap skips and that the two should be maintained by the same person. My second thought is that zenmap should probably be made into a slave of nmap as that may make it easier. Having said that - I plan on helping with ports and will adopt zenmap if needed as I think it should be kept available. -- Shane Ambler FreeBSD (at) ShaneWare (dot) Biz http://ShaneWare.Biz