Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:35:29 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: ertr1013@student.uu.se Cc: brandt@fokus.gmd.de, freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A few questions about a few includes Message-ID: <20020304.093529.35706437.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <20020304104158.GB63341@student.uu.se> References: <20020303180029.GA56041@student.uu.se> <20020304102750.O74223-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> <20020304104158.GB63341@student.uu.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020304104158.GB63341@student.uu.se>
Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> writes:
: I think it is still there (and my draft copy says the same thing).
: I was thinking about the original C89 standard which does not allow it
: (and does not allow incomplete array types in structs). Guess I should
: have said which standard I was referring to.
struct foo {
char array[0];
};
appears to be in C-99 but not C-89. If you have the draft, so far the
only thing I've noticed that is different between the draft and the
final standard is that there's 10-15 more footnotes in the final
standard than were in the final draft.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020304.093529.35706437.imp>