From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 4 21:45:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from heidegger.uol.com.br (heidegger.uol.com.br [200.230.198.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730BA37BA22 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:45:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lioux-alias-ppp-freebsd-stable=freebsd.org@uol.com.br) Received: from 200-191-158-113-as.acessonet.com.br (200-191-158-113-as.acessonet.com.br [200.191.158.113]) by heidegger.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA04285 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 01:45:18 -0300 (BRT) Received: (qmail 47835 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Apr 2000 04:42:01 -0000 From: lioux@uol.com.br Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 01:42:01 -0300 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: How stable is the ATA code? Message-ID: <20000405014201.C41981@Fedaykin.here> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I heard some rumors about some instability on the new ATA code combined with DMA mode. Is this founded? Can I safely build the latest stable and have a peaceful sleep? Disabling DMA is not acceptable. I am running stable not current. :-) I mean that it is totably acceptable on the current system, but this is my stable damnit. Please rollback the CVS if the rumors are real, this is a stable system. Users, even cvsupers, will overlook UPDATING, build a new kernel and get a trashed FS. If this is not true, I totally apologize. -- Regards mferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message