From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 22 13:18:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA04256 for current-outgoing; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 13:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA04248 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) id KAA19763; Mon, 22 Apr 1996 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604221727.KAA19763@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: What do folks think of the following patch? To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 10:27:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "JULIAN Elischer" Cc: nate@sri.MT.net, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6802.830138137@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Apr 21, 96 06:55:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I would like a make world to also install etc if the DESTDIR is not / I often make images of systems and want /etc to be rebuilt as well, but it never is.. > > > /etc is not updated across upgrades, nor is it vulnerable to src > smashing. > > Jordan > > > > > It seems like world, update, all and install should be targets which > > > include an optional sub-make in /etc/Makefile for the corresponding > > > target (only the diff to world: is shown here). This would give us > > > a nice way of doing site-specific stuff which is preserved across changes > > > to /usr/src/Makefile. > > > > Since both /etc/make.conf and /usr/src/Makefile are generated by us, > > what does adding it in the tree vs. having them add buy us? > > > > In either case, the end-user has to edit the files. > > > > (I'm not against the idea, but I don't see any purpose for it.) > > > > > > > > nate > >