From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 18:21:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0578E16A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:21:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FAE43D54 for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdzz@verizon.net) Received: from [10.0.0.25] ([68.236.212.14])0.04 <0IDA00BJCYZMWM00@vms046.mailsrvcs.net> for emulation@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:21:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:21:49 -0500 From: bsdzz In-reply-to: <42346F88.1050005@relcom.ru> To: Anatoly Tyukanov Message-id: <423484BD.1090901@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <42346F88.1050005@relcom.ru> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050226) cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: QEMU and Win2000 Pro SP4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:21:24 -0000 Anatoly Tyukanov wrote: > hey > > I have qemu-0.6.2s.20050305 running on 5.3-RELEASE-p5 but when im > trying to install XP SP2 it hangs while it was copying necessary files > for setup. Next attempt was XP SP1. It was installed sucessfully but > after M$ XP logo it reboot somehow. > I saw warnings on qemu homepage but I suppose someone could run XP on it? I haven't tried XP Pro yet. I am avoiding it, because I dislike their "activation feature". I have several legal copies of XP Pro, but I always have to call Microsoft for permission to install them - which I *hate* doing! I'm trying to get Windows 2000 Pro running, if at all possible. Win 2000 is also faster than XP under emulation (it's simpler I guess). thx