From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 15:51:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CF016A41F for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:51:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806DF43D45 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from p54A3EAE3.dip.t-dialin.net [84.163.234.227] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1E3bov3VVA-0008HE; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:51:45 +0200 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:51:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1123858936.22864.252.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> <1123861547.22864.256.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> In-Reply-To: <1123861547.22864.256.camel@torgau.office.netline.net.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1593939.JSmLmUunit"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508121751.27737.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Subject: Re: Bridge and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:51:51 -0000 --nextPart1593939.JSmLmUunit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 12 August 2005 17:45, Rod wrote: > Found my answer : > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html > > >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code. > >Neither has it IPv6 support. This is not true. As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both I= Pv6=20 and full pf support. Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just= =20 use the same settings you would use for ipf. The old bridge does not allow= =20 for stateful filtering however. The same is true for ipf and ipfw with the= =20 old bridge code. > On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:02, Rod wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone know if their is a setting similar to that of ipf and ipfw > > for setting bridged devices to use a firewall in sysctl e.g. > > > > for ipfw: > > > > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=3D1 > > > > for ipf > > > > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=3D1 > > > > Guessed at net.link.ether.bridge.pf=3D1 but no such luck. Is this at all > > possible with PF on freebsd? > > > > kind regards > > > > Rod =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1593939.JSmLmUunit Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC/MV/XyyEoT62BG0RAmEwAJ9IFbqWCzG9r7PCWHvuaatcdA7K7QCdEHg+ ap0DyjTAkckhX8zO+dVG5I8= =sPh0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1593939.JSmLmUunit--