Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:22:19 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228857 - in head/usr.bin: . csup Message-ID: <4EF8129B.9010605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111224230356.GA69395@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201112241216.pBOCGd1H012696@svn.freebsd.org> <4EF645D2.8080407@FreeBSD.org> <20111224230356.GA69395@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/24/2011 15:03, Steve Kargl wrote: > Imagine that! A request from someone, who is a staunch > anti-profiled lib supporter, to (I don't know) profile > a change to the system. Um, yeah. That was both pointless and uncalled for. I have nothing against profiled libs, I just don't think they should be enabled by default since the overwhelming majority of users have no use for them whatsoever. OTOH, as developers, it's our responsibility to make sure that the changes we make move things in the right direction, which is what I'm asking to confirm here. Doug -- [^L] Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF8129B.9010605>