From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 12 19:46:57 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2115106566C;
	Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EFE14FD0B;
	Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:57 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4DF517B2.7000209@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:46:58 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jhell@DataIX.net
References: <4DF3E98B.40108@FreeBSD.org> <20110612085649.GA11503@DataIX.net>
	<4DF49181.1000007@entel.upc.edu>
	<20110612185631.GA15184@DataIX.net>
	<20110612192440.GB37735@in-addr.com>
	<20110612194237.GD15184@DataIX.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110612194237.GD15184@DataIX.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>, Gustau P?rez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rc.d script to load kernel modules
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:46:57 -0000

On 6/12/2011 12:42 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:

> Yes I agree. I was just stating that simply for the previous post
> implying where ZFS was slower than UFS.

No, it wasn't. You completely fail to understand the problem. Stop 
writing, and start reading. As in, read the threads on both -arch and 
the svn list, and this entire thread again, then wait an hour or two 
before posting anything else. (Yes, I'm serious)

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/