From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:40:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF497106564A; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [IPv6:2001:4068:10::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A88FC12; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6338241C710; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:40:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([192.168.74.103]) by localhost (amavis.fra.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OeKFaYK3KxTX; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:40:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id C516E41C735; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:40:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56AD44490C; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20110108211712.T14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20110107103837.E14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20110108185914.D14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Randall Stewart , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UDP checksum broken, -head and releng_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:40:07 -0000 On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Also, are there any restrictions with jail? If we're > in a jail and can't find an address, do we really want > to allow _any_ address set with an MC option? I've > never used jails, but was just wondering if the > application could somehow use an interface address > that it wasn't allowed to use. Yes, I think you can do that there but I'd hope the bind following would fail it. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it! http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html