From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 08:52:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC3A106566C for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACCA8FC0A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9L8q1nx011982; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:52:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p9L8q0gw011979; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:52:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:52:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20111020082234.GA4568@britannica.bec.de> <4EA00DEF.3030905@FreeBSD.org> <20111020190553.6bf95790@kan.dnsalias.net> <20111020192653.6425f018@kan.dnsalias.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:52:01 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: .eh_frame, .eh_frame_hdr - how to remove that trash X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:52:03 -0000 >> that i do not want to debug isn't it? > > It seems like a binutils bug (or somewhere in that immediate > neighborhood) because all debugging related sections should be > stripped out by strip including unwind, correct? indeed.