From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 3 23:51:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA17260 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:51:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from burka.carrier.kiev.ua (root@burka.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA17168 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 1998 23:51:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archer@grape.carrier.kiev.ua) Received: from unicorn.carrier.kiev.ua (unicorn.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.113]) by burka.carrier.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.Who.Cares) with ESMTP id JAA05436 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:50:53 +0200 (EET) Received: from kozlik.carrier.kiev.ua (kozlik.carrier.kiev.ua [193.193.193.111]) by unicorn.carrier.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA05955 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:50:52 +0200 (EET) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by kozlik.carrier.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8/8.Who.Cares) with UUCP id JAA10367 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:45:45 +0200 (EET) Received: (from archer@localhost) by grape.carrier.kiev.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA06426; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:40:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from archer) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:40:03 +0200 (EET) From: Alexander Litvin Message-Id: <199803040740.JAA06426@grape.carrier.kiev.ua> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Panic with CURRENT & softupdates-240298 X-Newsgroups: grape.freebsd.current In-Reply-To: <34FC7EFC.237C228A@whistle.com> <19980303222750.1133.qmail@devious.lustig.com> <34FC9BBE.6201DD56@whistle.com> Organization: Lucky Grape User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980202 (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <34FC9BBE.6201DD56@whistle.com> you wrote: > NO Well, what about soft updates being commited to CURRENT? I mean - a lot of stuff is hanging as diffs, and cvsupping and patching each time is a bit annoying. Not to count that patchis are not applied cleanly sometimes. > (though you could try... you could make it a completely removable option > with appropriate ifdefs.) > but the VM interactions would be different > and the vfs interface has changed a bit. > but it might hurt 2.2's stability. > Barry Lustig wrote: >> >> Is anyone planning on back-porting soft-updates to 2.5.X? >> barry -- Litvin Alexander No SIGNATURE available at this run-level To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message