From owner-aic7xxx Sat Oct 18 14:17:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA04844 for aic7xxx-outgoing; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-aic7xxx) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA04837 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 14:17:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.7.3) id PAA20428; Sat, 18 Oct 1997 15:17:10 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 15:17:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199710182117.PAA20428@narnia.plutotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8 References: In-Reply-To: From: gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com (Justin T. Gibbs) Subject: Re: SCB timeouts.. :/ X-Original-Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.aic7xxx To: Alex cc: aic7xxx@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-aic7xxx@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article , Alex writes: > I was just doing some rather disk intensive stuff, and noticed that > everything kinda hung for a bit, and this popped up in the logs and on > ttyv0. I guess I'm lucky that it didn't totally "wedge" the bus and force > me to reboot, however this begs the question, when is the new CAM layer > going to be committed (I'm sure IDE ZIP owners are wating too ;-) )? It won't be committed to current until it supports all of the devices that the "old SCSI code" supports. You're welcome to test the snapshots though and I would be interested in knowing if they fixed this problem. > - alex -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD - Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================