From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jul 23 6:30: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AD637B406 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6NDU2q41845; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200107231330.f6NDU2q41845@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dima Dorfman Subject: Re: bin/29164: [PATCH] lack of 'Do not fragment' flag in ping(8) Reply-To: Dima Dorfman Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/29164; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dima Dorfman To: maxim@macomnet.ru Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/29164: [PATCH] lack of 'Do not fragment' flag in ping(8) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:21:28 -0700 maxim@macomnet.ru writes: > >Fix: > > Stolen from OpenBSD. > > Index: ping.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/ping/ping.c,v > retrieving revision 1.59 > diff -u -r1.59 ping.c > --- ping.c 2001/07/07 19:09:21 1.59 > +++ ping.c 2001/07/20 10:47:35 ... How about sending this to -audit? ping is security-sensitive software (being setuid), so I think a review is in order. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message