From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 8 22: 2:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC5737B401 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f1962cM19819; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:02:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:02:38 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200102090602.f1962cM19819@earth.backplane.com> To: Andre Oppermann , Rik van Riel , Mike Silbersack , Poul-Henning Kamp , Charles Randall , Dan Phoenix , Alfred Perlstein , Jos Backus , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) References: <3A805035.C71AAD5E@monzoon.net> <200102061943.f16Jhp365113@earth.backplane.com> <3A805938.96ED890D@monzoon.net> <200102062018.f16KIdx66146@earth.backplane.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, after a long conversation with Mr Bernstein and Kirk it turns out that all my blathering about a normal FFS mount being easily corruptable due to a crash occuring during heavy disk I/O (e.g. from qmail) is so much smoke. The fsync()/rename() combination that QMail does should be sufficient to guarentee (baring a bug in kernel) that a crash will not result in any lost mail queue files when using a normal FFS mount (without softupdates). However, I still recommend using softupdates. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message