From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  6 20:32:36 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8CFDE1;
 Fri,  6 Dec 2013 20:32:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (ultimatedns.net [209.180.214.225])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC7341E5C;
 Fri,  6 Dec 2013 20:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB6KXISp008463;
 Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:33:24 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from chrish@UltimateDNS.NET)
Received: (from www@localhost)
 by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id rB6KXCkt008457;
 Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:33:12 -0800 (PST)
 (envelope-from chrish@UltimateDNS.NET)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net ([209.180.214.225])
 (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP;
 Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <116bdeb6a2577cfc5454bb057b43af09.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131206154249.GB78659@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
References: <20131205215437.GA32134@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
 <20131206133709.GA60741@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
 <0de1dbb77b9352e1546e777dbed1fee9.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
 <20131206154249.GB78659@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [games/ofortune] CFT and pending issues
From: chrish@UltimateDNS.NET
To: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" <freebsd@skysmurf.nl>
User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:32:36 -0000

> chrish@UltimateDNS.NET wrote:
>
>>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
>>
>> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
>> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=BSD
> is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE?

Greetings,

/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk and
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk

don't hold the clues for you?

Best wishes.

--Chris

>
> AvW
>
> --
> I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
>