Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:56:38 +0400
From:      Andrey Zonov <zont@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r242847 - in head/sys: i386/include kern
Message-ID:  <50AB9A26.8060807@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <50A8ECEE.9020908@freebsd.org>
References:  <201211100208.qAA28e0v004842@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=HPmQS1T-LFsZ=DuKEqH30iJFpkz%2BJGhLr4OBL8nohjg@mail.gmail.com> <509DC25E.5030306@mu.org> <509E3162.5020702@FreeBSD.org> <509E7E7C.9000104@mu.org> <CAF6rxgmV8dx-gsQceQKuMQEsJ%2BGkExcKYxEvQ3kY%2B5_nSjvA3w@mail.gmail.com> <509E830D.5080006@mu.org> <509E847E.30509@mu.org> <CAF6rxgnfm4HURYp=O4MY8rB6H1tGiqJ3rdPx0rZ8Swko5mAOZg@mail.gmail.com> <509E8930.50800@mu.org> <CAF6rxgmabVuR0JoFURRUF%2Bed0hmT=LF_n5LXSip0ibU0hk6qWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCouCWr4NKbgnjKfLcjc8EWqG0wRiSmXDDnrnM3%2BUc8KVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxg=ryNEMEidJdgf8-Ab=bD15R1ypcz-bS8183U4JK_Q17g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGE5yCoeTXf7x4ZBDXnHJ4dnFi-_2R28kB8HxOB%2B=Je4aJGYQQ@mail.gmail.com> <509EA869.6030407@freebsd.org> <509ED439.8090607@mu.org> <509EDD93.3020001@freebsd.org> <50A8EB3E.6060807@FreeBSD.org> <50A8ECEE.9020908@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB6ECCE4BE0691CAC46EE755B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/18/12 6:13 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 18.11.2012 15:05, Andrey Zonov wrote:
>> On 11/11/12 3:04 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>> On 10.11.2012 23:24, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/12 11:18 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>>>>> On 10.11.2012 19:04, Peter Wemm wrote:
>>>>>> This is complicated but we need a simple user visible view of it. =
 It
>>>>>> really needs to be something like "nmbclusters defaults to 6% of
>>>>>> physical ram, with machine dependent limits".  The MD limits are b=
ad
>>>>>> enough, and using bogo-units like "maxusers" just makes it worse.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that would be optimal.
>>>>>
>>>> No it would not.
>>>>
>>>> I used to be able to tell people "hey just try increasing maxusers"
>>>> and they would and suddenly the
>>>> box would be OK.
>>>>
>>>> Now I'll have to remember 3,4,5,10,20x tunable to increase?
>>>
>>> No.  The whole mbuf and cluster stuff isn't allocated or reserved
>>> at boot time.  We simply need a limit to prevent it from exhausting
>>> all available kvm / physical memory whichever is less.
>>>
>>
>> For now, we have limit which does not allow to run even one igb(4) NIC=

>> in 9k jumbo configuration.
>=20
> My patch for mbuf* zone auto-sizing does fix that, or not?
>=20

Are you talking about r242910?  I have not tried it.

--=20
Andrey Zonov


--------------enigB6ECCE4BE0691CAC46EE755B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQq5opAAoJEBWLemxX/CvTB8MH/Avd++t3itcuUYqVz1te6t2a
0bFIAid7UzySvk8pLjNUnLkXJsfc/P7p2A5QTYg2gbwXoQ+Fp2N2CxYoWBpAymba
jzg2ZFvoihf3/pmKQfxx5T2P7EBWwnmSipVvU83n9I452f2m3nu4s+PLOsY0NOvC
8lGqLSAOOkbwvhUur6WKK4YeUC/F6K7uxEQaig7ibrkj86o9hRz0zY8+inBN1Pih
eYnPPFWk7Bu1zNd85uBJDGw4xakycKk+iEEPaxCBouv9cplr2mqtEqG9Tqo5swIa
Nl4+72dokqm0/fT3F4DiyZmnmOxny5INvGeJ09aquplZqvOeKv1zeNkOTjHmioE=
=8Ugw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigB6ECCE4BE0691CAC46EE755B--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AB9A26.8060807>